Difference between revisions of "Attention-getting Ways To Product Alternative"

From Playmobil Wiki
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Before deciding on a project management [https://altox.io/si/audiobook-bay software alternative], you may be considering the environmental impacts of the software. For more information on environmental impacts of each option on water and air quality, and the land surrounding the project, read the following. Alternatives that are more environmentally friendly are ones that are less likely to cause harm to the environment. Here are some of the most popular options. Finding the right software for your needs is a crucial step in making the right choice. You may also want to know the pros and cons of each software.<br><br>Air quality can be affected by air pollution.<br><br>The section on Impacts of Project Alternatives in an EIR exposes the potential environmental impact of a proposed development. The EIR must determine the alternative that is "environmentally superior". An alternative may not be feasible or compatible with the environment due to its inability to achieve the project's objectives. However, other factors could be a factor in determining that the alternative is less desirable, for example, infeasibility.<br><br>In eight resource areas In eight resource areas, the Alternative Project is superior than the Proposed Project. The Project Alternative reduces traffic, GHG emissions and noise. However, it would also require mitigation measures that are similar to those of the Proposed Project. Furthermore, Alternative 1 has less negative impacts on geology, cultural resources, and aesthetics. This means that it would not impact the quality of air. The Project Alternative is therefore the most suitable option.<br><br>The Proposed Project has more regional air quality impacts than the Alternative Use Alternative, which includes a variety of modes of transport. In contrast to the Proposed Project, the Alternative Use Alternative would reduce dependence on traditional automobiles and substantially reduce air pollution. In addition, it would result in less development within the Platinum Triangle, which is consistent with the AQMP. This Alternative Use Alternative would not conflict with UPRR rail operations, and the impacts on local intersections will be very minimal.<br><br>The Alternative Use Alternative has fewer operational air quality impacts than the Proposed Project, in addition to its short-term impact. It could reduce trips by 30% and lower the impact of construction-related air quality on the environment. The Alternative Use Alternative would reduce traffic impacts by 30%, and also significantly reduce ROG, CO, and NOX emissions. The Alternative Use Alternative would reduce regional air pollution emissions, and meet SCAQMD’s Affordable Housing requirements.<br><br>The Alternatives chapter in an Environmental Impact Report will discuss and evaluate the alternatives to the project as required by CEQA. The Alternatives section of an Environmental Impact Report is a essential section of an EIR. It offers possible alternatives to the Proposed Project and evaluates them. The CEQA Guidelines serve as the basis for analyzing alternatives. These guidelines outline the criteria to choose the best option. This chapter also contains information about the Environmental Impact Report Alternatives section.<br><br>Water quality impacts<br><br>The plan would create eight new homes , an athletic court, as well as the creation of a pond or swales. The alternative plan would decrease the amount of impervious surfaces as well as improve water quality through the addition of open space. The project would also have less unavoidable effects on the quality of water. While neither of the alternatives could meet all standards for water quality The proposed project will result in a less significant total impact.<br><br>The EIR must also identify an "environmentally superior" alternative to the Proposed Project. The EIR must assess the environmental impact of each alternative against the Proposed Project and compare them. While the discussion of alternative environmental impacts may not be as detailed as that of project impacts but it must be comprehensive enough to provide adequate information regarding the alternatives. It may not be possible to discuss the effects of alternative choices in depth. This is because the alternatives do't have the same size, scope, and impact as the Project Alternative.<br><br>The No Project, Foreseeable Development Alternative will result in somewhat greater short-term construction impact than the Proposed Project. However, it will result in fewer overall environmental impacts and would also involve more grading and soil hauling activities. A significant portion of environmental impacts would be regional and local. The proposed project is not as environmentally friendly than the No Project, Foreseeable Development Alternative. The Environmental Impact Assessment of the Proposed Project is limited in numerous ways. It is important to evaluate it alongside the [https://altox.io/ps/keyla Alternatives Altox].<br><br>The Alternative Project will require an General Plan amendment, alternative products the PTMU Overlay Zone, and zone reclassification. These measures would be consistent with the most current General Plan policies. The Project will require additional services, educational facilities and recreation facilities, as well as other amenities. In the same way, it could produce more environmental impacts than the Proposed Project, while being less environmentally beneficial. This analysis is just a small part of the evaluation of the alternatives and is not the sole decision.<br><br>Impacts of the project on the area<br><br>The impact analysis of the Proposed Project compares the impacts of alternative [https://altox.io/mi/empire-earth-series projects] to the proposed project. The Alternative Alternatives do not substantially alter the development area. The impacts to soils and water quality would be similar. Existing regulations and mitigation measures would be applicable to the Alternative Alternatives. The impact analysis of alternative projects will be used to determine the best mitigation measures for the Proposed Project. Before finalizing the zoning plan or general plans for the site, it is important to look at the various alternatives.<br><br>The Environmental Assessment (EA), examines the possible impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding areas. The assessment should be able to consider the impact on air quality and traffic. Alternative 2 is the most suitable option. Alternative 2 would have no significant air quality impact, and is considered to be the best environmental choice. The effects of different options for the project on the area of the project and the stakeholder should be taken into account when making a final decision. This analysis should be done alongside feasibility studies.<br><br>When completing the Environmental Assessment, the EIR must determine the more sustainable alternative based on a comparison of the effects of each alternative. Based on Table 6-1, the analysis highlights the effects of the alternatives based on their capacity to minimize or eliminate significant impacts. Table 6-1 lists the alternative impacts and their significance after mitigation. The "No Project" Alternative is the environmentally more sustainable option if it achieves the primary objectives of the project.<br><br>An EIR should be brief in describing the reasons for choosing alternatives. Alternatives could be rejected from detailed consideration due to their inability or inability to meet basic project objectives. Alternatives may be excluded for consideration in depth based on inability or inability to prevent significant environmental impacts. Regardless of the reason, the alternatives must be presented with sufficient information that permits meaningful comparisons to be made with the proposed project.<br><br>Environmentally preferable alternative<br><br>There are several mitigation measures that are included in the Environmentally Preferable Alternative to the Project. A different alternative that has a higher residential density would result in more demand for  [https://cannabisconnections.com/blog/362299/attention-getting-ways-to-service-alternatives/ Alternatives Altox] public services. Additional mitigation measures may be required. The Proposed Project is also more environmentally sensitive due to the greater residential intensity of the alternative. The environmental impact analysis must take into consideration the various factors that can affect the project's environmental performance in order to determine which alternative is more environmentally friendly. This assessment can be found on the Environmental Impact Report.<br><br>The Proposed Project could have significant impacts on the site's cultural, biological, or natural resources. The Environmentally Preferable Alternative would reduce these impacts and encourage intermodal transport that minimizes dependence on traditional automobiles. The Environmentally Preferable Alternative would produce similar air quality impacts, but would be less severe regionally. Both options would have significant and unavoidable impacts on the quality of air. However the Environmentally Preferable [https://altox.io/es/performance-maintainer Alternative] is preferred for the Proposed Project.<br><br>The Environmentally Preferable Alternative must be identified. In other words, the Environmentally Preferable Alternative is the alternative that has the least environmental impact and has the lowest impact on the community. It also meets most objectives of the project. An Environmentally Preferable Alternative to the Project is a better choice over an [https://altox.io/fa/kaitai-struct service alternative] that doesn't Meet Environmental Quality Standards<br><br>The Environmentally Preferable Alternative to the Project reduces the amount of noise and pollution created by the Project. It also reduces the amount of earth movement as well as site preparation, construction and noise pollution in areas with sensitive land uses. The Alternative to the Project is more sustainable than the Proposed Project. It could be included in the General Plan to address land use compatibility issues.
You may want to think about the environmental impact of project management software prior to making the decision. Learn more about the impact of each alternative on the quality of air and water and the environment around the project. Alternatives that are more environmentally friendly are those that are less likely to harm the environment. Here are some of the [https://altox.io/la/newsflow Newsflow: Top Alternatives Features Pricing & More - Newsfluxus omnes nuntios in uno loco deliciarum tuarum websites adfert ideo non debes vacare in pascuis interretialibus amplius semper eris cum proximis nuntiis et articulis e circum mundo tactus. - ALTOX] alternatives. Choosing the right software for your needs is an important step towards making the right choice. You might also be interested to learn about the pros and cons for each software.<br><br>Air quality has an impact on<br><br>The Impacts of Project Alternatives section of an EIR provides a description of the possible impacts of a development plan on the environment. The EIR must determine the alternative that is "environmentally superior". An alternative might not be feasible or sustainable for the environment, depending on its inability achieve the project's objectives. However, other factors could decide that an alternative is not viable, such as infeasibility.<br><br>In eight resource areas In eight resource areas, the Alternative Project is superior than the Proposed Project. The Project Alternative significantly reduces impacts related to traffic, GHG emissions, and noise. It will require mitigation measures similar to those used in the Proposed Project. Additionally, Alternative 1 has less negative effects on geology, cultural resources, and aesthetics. Therefore, it would not have an any effect on air quality. Therefore the Project Alternative is the best alternative for this project.<br><br>The Proposed Project has more regional impacts on air quality than the Alternative Use Alternative, which incorporates various modes of transportation. Unlike the Proposed Project, the Alternative Use Alternative would reduce reliance on traditional automobiles and substantially reduce pollution of the air. Additionally, it will lead to less development within the Platinum Triangle, which is in line with the AQMP. This Alternative Use Alternative would not be in conflict with UPRR rail operations, and the impacts on local intersections will be minimal.<br><br>In addition to the general short-term impacts Alongside the short-term short-term impacts, the Alternative Use Alternative has less operational air quality impacts than the Proposed Project. It will reduce the number of trips by 30%, while decreasing the impacts on air quality resulting from construction. Alternative Use Alternative would significantly reduce the traffic impacts by 30%, as well as drastically reducing ROG, CO and NOX emissions. The Alternative Use Alternative would also reduce air pollution in the region and would meet SCAQMD's Affordable Housing requirements.<br><br>The Alternatives chapter in an Environmental Impact Report will discuss and analyze the project's alternatives, as required by CEQA. The Alternatives chapter of an Environmental Impact Report is a important section of the EIR. It evaluates the Proposed Project and identifies possible alternatives. CEQA Guidelines provide the basis for alternative analysis. These guidelines provide the criteria used to select the alternative. The chapter also provides details about the Environmental Impact Report Alternatives section.<br><br>The quality of water can affect<br><br>The project would create eight new homes , an basketball court, along with a pond or swales. The proposed alternative would limit the amount of new impervious surfaces and improve water quality by allowing for larger open spaces. The proposed project will also have fewer unavoidable effects on the quality of water. While neither of the options will satisfy all water quality standards, the proposed project would have a lesser overall impact.<br><br>The EIR must also identify an "environmentally superior" alternative to the Proposed Project. The EIR must analyze the environmental impact of each alternative versus the Proposed Project and compare them. While the discussion of the environmental impacts of alternative alternatives may be less thorough than those of project impacts however, it should be enough to provide enough information about the alternatives. A comprehensive discussion of the consequences of alternative solutions may not be possible. Because the alternatives aren't as large, diverse, or impactful as the Project Alternative, this is the reason why it might not be possible to analyze the impact of these alternatives.<br><br>The No Project, Foreseeable Development Alternative would have slightly more immediate construction impacts than the Proposed Project. It will have less overall environmental effects, but it would require more soil hauling and grading. The environmental impacts would be largely local and regional. The proposed project is the least environmentally beneficial alternative to the No Project, Foreseeable Development Alternative. The Environmental Impact Assessment of the Proposed Project has several significant limitations, and the alternatives should be evaluated in this regard.<br><br>The Alternative Project will require an General Plan amendment, the PTMU Overlay Zone, and zoning reclassification. These measures would be in compliance with the most current General Plan policies. The Project will require additional services, educational facilities recreation facilities, and other public amenities. It could have more negative impacts than the Proposed Project but be less beneficial to the environment. This analysis is only a part of the evaluation of alternatives and is not the final judgment.<br><br>Impacts on project area<br><br>The Impact Analysis of the Proposed Proposed Project examines the impact of other projects to the Proposed Project. The Alternative Alternatives do not substantially alter the area of development. Similar impacts on soils and water quality would occur. Existing regulations and mitigation measures will apply to the Alternative Alternatives. The impact analysis of the alternative projects will be used to determine the best mitigation measures for the Proposed Project. It is recommended to consider the alternatives before finalizing the zoning and general plans for the site.<br><br>The Environmental Assessment (EA) identifies the effects of the proposed development on adjacent areas. The assessment should be able to consider the impact on air quality and traffic. The Alternative 2 would have no significant impact on air quality, and is considered to be the best environmental choice. The Impacts of project alternatives on the project's location and the stakeholders should be taken into account when making the final decision. This analysis should be conducted simultaneously with feasibility studies.<br><br>The Environmental Assessment must be completed by the EIR. The process is by comparing the impacts of each option. The analysis of alternatives is carried out using Table 6-1. It shows the impact of each alternative according to their capacity or inability to significantly reduce or eliminate significant impacts. Table 6-1 also lists the effects of the alternatives and Unicorn.io: Meilleures alternatives fonctionnalités prix et plus [https://altox.io/ko/ksysguard KSysGuard: 최고의 대안 기능 가격 등 - System Guard를 사용하면 시스템에 대한 정보와 통계를 모니터링할 수 있습니다. - ALTOX] Unicorn.io est une plateforme dédiée aux Emplois technologiques en Europe. Les candidats peuvent créer un profil entièrement gratuit et s'asseoir pendant que les entreprises informatiques vous recherchent. [https://altox.io/hi/cuetools CUETools: शीर्ष विकल्प सुविधाएँ मूल्य निर्धारण और अधिक - CUETools दोषरहित सीडी रिप्स को बदलने और सत्यापित करने के लिए उपकरणों का एक सूट है। यह दोषरहित छवियों को पटरियों में विभाजित कर सकता है AccurateRip डेटाबेस के खिलाफ एक रिप को फिर से सत्यापित कर सकता है त्रुटियों की मरम्मत कर सकता है और FLAC / WavPack / APE / TTA / ALAC के बीच परिवर्तित कर सकता है। - ALTOX] ALTOX their importance after mitigation. The "No Project" Alternative is the environmentally superior option if it fulfills the fundamental goals of the project.<br><br>An EIR should provide a concise description of the reasons for [http://sew.isofts.kiev.ua/index.php/Read_This_To_Change_How_You_Project_Alternative sew.isofts.kiev.ua] choosing different options. Alternatives will not be considered for  [https://www.keralaplot.com/user/profile/2090927 https://www.keralaplot.com/] detailed consideration if they are unfeasible or fail to achieve the fundamental goals of the project. Alternatives may be excluded from detailed consideration based on inability or inability to prevent significant environmental impacts. Regardless of the reason, the alternatives shall be presented with sufficient information to allow meaningful comparisons to be made with the proposed project.<br><br>Alternatives that are environmentally friendly<br><br>The Environmentally Preferable Alternative to the Project includes several mitigation measures. A different alternative that has a higher density of housing would lead to an increased demand for public services. Additional mitigation measures could be required. The higher residential intensity of the alternative is environmentally inferior to the Proposed Project. The environmental impact analysis must take into consideration all factors that could influence the environmental performance of the project in order to determine which alternative is more environmentally friendly. The Environmental Impact Report provides this assessment.<br><br>The Proposed Project would cause significant impacts on the cultural, biological, and natural resources of the site. The Environmentally Preferable Alternative would reduce these effects and encourage intermodal transport that minimizes dependence upon traditional automobiles. The Environmentally Preferable Alternative would produce similar impact on air quality, however, it would be less severe regionally. While both options would have significant, unavoidable effects on air quality however, the Environmentally Preferable Alternative would be preferred for the Proposed Project.<br><br>It is crucial to identify the Environmentally Preferable Alternative. In other terms, the Environmentally Preferable Alternative is the alternative that has the least impact on the environment and has the least impact [https://altox.io/gl/email-on-deck Email On Deck: Principais alternativas funcións prezos e moito máis - Correo electrónico temporal gratuíto para protexer a túa privacidade e contra o spam. - ALTOX] the community. It also fulfills the majority of project objectives. A Environmentally Preferable Alternative is better than alternatives that don't meet Environmental Quality Standards<br><br>The Environmentally Preferable Alternative to the Project reduces the amount of noise and pollution created by the Project. It also reduces earth movement as well as site preparation, construction and noise pollution in areas with sensitive land uses. The Alternative to the Project is more eco-friendly than the Proposed Project. It could be included in the General Plan to address land use compatibility issues.

Latest revision as of 15:42, 4 August 2022

You may want to think about the environmental impact of project management software prior to making the decision. Learn more about the impact of each alternative on the quality of air and water and the environment around the project. Alternatives that are more environmentally friendly are those that are less likely to harm the environment. Here are some of the Newsflow: Top Alternatives Features Pricing & More - Newsfluxus omnes nuntios in uno loco deliciarum tuarum websites adfert ideo non debes vacare in pascuis interretialibus amplius semper eris cum proximis nuntiis et articulis e circum mundo tactus. - ALTOX alternatives. Choosing the right software for your needs is an important step towards making the right choice. You might also be interested to learn about the pros and cons for each software.

Air quality has an impact on

The Impacts of Project Alternatives section of an EIR provides a description of the possible impacts of a development plan on the environment. The EIR must determine the alternative that is "environmentally superior". An alternative might not be feasible or sustainable for the environment, depending on its inability achieve the project's objectives. However, other factors could decide that an alternative is not viable, such as infeasibility.

In eight resource areas In eight resource areas, the Alternative Project is superior than the Proposed Project. The Project Alternative significantly reduces impacts related to traffic, GHG emissions, and noise. It will require mitigation measures similar to those used in the Proposed Project. Additionally, Alternative 1 has less negative effects on geology, cultural resources, and aesthetics. Therefore, it would not have an any effect on air quality. Therefore the Project Alternative is the best alternative for this project.

The Proposed Project has more regional impacts on air quality than the Alternative Use Alternative, which incorporates various modes of transportation. Unlike the Proposed Project, the Alternative Use Alternative would reduce reliance on traditional automobiles and substantially reduce pollution of the air. Additionally, it will lead to less development within the Platinum Triangle, which is in line with the AQMP. This Alternative Use Alternative would not be in conflict with UPRR rail operations, and the impacts on local intersections will be minimal.

In addition to the general short-term impacts Alongside the short-term short-term impacts, the Alternative Use Alternative has less operational air quality impacts than the Proposed Project. It will reduce the number of trips by 30%, while decreasing the impacts on air quality resulting from construction. Alternative Use Alternative would significantly reduce the traffic impacts by 30%, as well as drastically reducing ROG, CO and NOX emissions. The Alternative Use Alternative would also reduce air pollution in the region and would meet SCAQMD's Affordable Housing requirements.

The Alternatives chapter in an Environmental Impact Report will discuss and analyze the project's alternatives, as required by CEQA. The Alternatives chapter of an Environmental Impact Report is a important section of the EIR. It evaluates the Proposed Project and identifies possible alternatives. CEQA Guidelines provide the basis for alternative analysis. These guidelines provide the criteria used to select the alternative. The chapter also provides details about the Environmental Impact Report Alternatives section.

The quality of water can affect

The project would create eight new homes , an basketball court, along with a pond or swales. The proposed alternative would limit the amount of new impervious surfaces and improve water quality by allowing for larger open spaces. The proposed project will also have fewer unavoidable effects on the quality of water. While neither of the options will satisfy all water quality standards, the proposed project would have a lesser overall impact.

The EIR must also identify an "environmentally superior" alternative to the Proposed Project. The EIR must analyze the environmental impact of each alternative versus the Proposed Project and compare them. While the discussion of the environmental impacts of alternative alternatives may be less thorough than those of project impacts however, it should be enough to provide enough information about the alternatives. A comprehensive discussion of the consequences of alternative solutions may not be possible. Because the alternatives aren't as large, diverse, or impactful as the Project Alternative, this is the reason why it might not be possible to analyze the impact of these alternatives.

The No Project, Foreseeable Development Alternative would have slightly more immediate construction impacts than the Proposed Project. It will have less overall environmental effects, but it would require more soil hauling and grading. The environmental impacts would be largely local and regional. The proposed project is the least environmentally beneficial alternative to the No Project, Foreseeable Development Alternative. The Environmental Impact Assessment of the Proposed Project has several significant limitations, and the alternatives should be evaluated in this regard.

The Alternative Project will require an General Plan amendment, the PTMU Overlay Zone, and zoning reclassification. These measures would be in compliance with the most current General Plan policies. The Project will require additional services, educational facilities recreation facilities, and other public amenities. It could have more negative impacts than the Proposed Project but be less beneficial to the environment. This analysis is only a part of the evaluation of alternatives and is not the final judgment.

Impacts on project area

The Impact Analysis of the Proposed Proposed Project examines the impact of other projects to the Proposed Project. The Alternative Alternatives do not substantially alter the area of development. Similar impacts on soils and water quality would occur. Existing regulations and mitigation measures will apply to the Alternative Alternatives. The impact analysis of the alternative projects will be used to determine the best mitigation measures for the Proposed Project. It is recommended to consider the alternatives before finalizing the zoning and general plans for the site.

The Environmental Assessment (EA) identifies the effects of the proposed development on adjacent areas. The assessment should be able to consider the impact on air quality and traffic. The Alternative 2 would have no significant impact on air quality, and is considered to be the best environmental choice. The Impacts of project alternatives on the project's location and the stakeholders should be taken into account when making the final decision. This analysis should be conducted simultaneously with feasibility studies.

The Environmental Assessment must be completed by the EIR. The process is by comparing the impacts of each option. The analysis of alternatives is carried out using Table 6-1. It shows the impact of each alternative according to their capacity or inability to significantly reduce or eliminate significant impacts. Table 6-1 also lists the effects of the alternatives and Unicorn.io: Meilleures alternatives fonctionnalités prix et plus KSysGuard: 최고의 대안 기능 가격 등 - System Guard를 사용하면 시스템에 대한 정보와 통계를 모니터링할 수 있습니다. - ALTOX Unicorn.io est une plateforme dédiée aux Emplois technologiques en Europe. Les candidats peuvent créer un profil entièrement gratuit et s'asseoir pendant que les entreprises informatiques vous recherchent. CUETools: शीर्ष विकल्प सुविधाएँ मूल्य निर्धारण और अधिक - CUETools दोषरहित सीडी रिप्स को बदलने और सत्यापित करने के लिए उपकरणों का एक सूट है। यह दोषरहित छवियों को पटरियों में विभाजित कर सकता है AccurateRip डेटाबेस के खिलाफ एक रिप को फिर से सत्यापित कर सकता है त्रुटियों की मरम्मत कर सकता है और FLAC / WavPack / APE / TTA / ALAC के बीच परिवर्तित कर सकता है। - ALTOX ALTOX their importance after mitigation. The "No Project" Alternative is the environmentally superior option if it fulfills the fundamental goals of the project.

An EIR should provide a concise description of the reasons for sew.isofts.kiev.ua choosing different options. Alternatives will not be considered for https://www.keralaplot.com/ detailed consideration if they are unfeasible or fail to achieve the fundamental goals of the project. Alternatives may be excluded from detailed consideration based on inability or inability to prevent significant environmental impacts. Regardless of the reason, the alternatives shall be presented with sufficient information to allow meaningful comparisons to be made with the proposed project.

Alternatives that are environmentally friendly

The Environmentally Preferable Alternative to the Project includes several mitigation measures. A different alternative that has a higher density of housing would lead to an increased demand for public services. Additional mitigation measures could be required. The higher residential intensity of the alternative is environmentally inferior to the Proposed Project. The environmental impact analysis must take into consideration all factors that could influence the environmental performance of the project in order to determine which alternative is more environmentally friendly. The Environmental Impact Report provides this assessment.

The Proposed Project would cause significant impacts on the cultural, biological, and natural resources of the site. The Environmentally Preferable Alternative would reduce these effects and encourage intermodal transport that minimizes dependence upon traditional automobiles. The Environmentally Preferable Alternative would produce similar impact on air quality, however, it would be less severe regionally. While both options would have significant, unavoidable effects on air quality however, the Environmentally Preferable Alternative would be preferred for the Proposed Project.

It is crucial to identify the Environmentally Preferable Alternative. In other terms, the Environmentally Preferable Alternative is the alternative that has the least impact on the environment and has the least impact Email On Deck: Principais alternativas funcións prezos e moito máis - Correo electrónico temporal gratuíto para protexer a túa privacidade e contra o spam. - ALTOX the community. It also fulfills the majority of project objectives. A Environmentally Preferable Alternative is better than alternatives that don't meet Environmental Quality Standards

The Environmentally Preferable Alternative to the Project reduces the amount of noise and pollution created by the Project. It also reduces earth movement as well as site preparation, construction and noise pollution in areas with sensitive land uses. The Alternative to the Project is more eco-friendly than the Proposed Project. It could be included in the General Plan to address land use compatibility issues.